An English village of around 350 residents staged a symbolic vote to “secede” from the United Kingdom in protest against the government’s plan to convert a nearby disused military base into an asylum reception center.
The village of Piddington, located about 15 miles northeast of Oxford, held a local referendum where 92% of eligible voters took part. Of the 312 ballots cast, 285 supported seeking secession and pursuing self-determination, with 26 opposing the measure and one ballot spoiled. While the vote has no legal standing, parish council leaders announced the village would now identify as the “Principality of Piddington.”
Community Concerns Over Asylum Center
Locals oppose the plan to accommodate asylum seekers at MoD Bicester (Site A), a former military base. Parish council chair Tim McNally expressed concerns about the village assimilating with a planned population of 1,250 men, calling the government’s approach “rushed.” Officials also worry the site could become a target for far-right protests amid rising anti-migration activism.
Government Response and Context
The government aims to relocate asylum seekers from hotels—an unpopular legacy arrangement—into military sites by 2029, following clashes at hotel locations. Officials emphasize this strategy is still under feasibility assessment and subject to planning approval, with phased occupancy expected and facilities designed for security and some self-sufficiency.
Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy described repurposed military bases as preferable housing options to hotels or rentals. However, these bases’ remote, rural settings may not be ideal for migrants needing access to services.
Political Landscape and Future Outlook
Asylum and migration remain deeply divisive issues in the UK, influencing the rise of populist parties and fueling protests such as recent events in Portsmouth. While Prime Minister Andy Burnham committed to reviewing community feedback, he maintains broad public support for moving asylum seekers out of hotels. The government cites safety and operational priorities, stating the facility would be monitored 24/7 and operate for at least a decade if approved.
